Box weight included in GaitFullBody 1.5

mkjung9980 · June 19, 2014, 2:03pm

Hi Damon,

Could you please make a zip file which contains all of your files instead of several files and upload it on your Dropbox again?

Best regards,
Moonki

dstambolian · June 22, 2014, 9:39pm

Hi Moonki

I removed the files, and uploaded a zip file with the latest model.

Sincerely thanks
Damon

mkjung9980 · June 23, 2014, 11:17am

Hi Damon,

Please write a new post with your new model Dropbox link.
I can’t find it.

Best regards,
Moonki

dstambolian · June 23, 2014, 8:21pm

mkjung9980 · July 3, 2014, 4:48pm

Hi Damon,

Finally I could make your model working!

Best regards,
Moonki

dstambolian · July 6, 2014, 6:08am

Hi Moonki

Thanks for looking at the model.

It does take a long time to run. Possibly it is the way the markers are weighted in the ModelSetup.

Can you please take a look and let me know if the changes in ModelSetup are going in the right direction?

The box looks better in the InverseDynamic model, I think this is due to removing AnyRefNode, and AnyDrawSeg.

The box still looks the same in MotionParameter, so I think this means that we only need a AnyRefNode in the MotionParameter folder?
Was there anything else I should understand that improved the model?

Sincerely
Damon

mkjung9980 · July 7, 2014, 3:49pm

Hi Damon,

Regarding the running time, it is not related to the markers.
It is just because you are running the inverse dynamics with the full muscle model. So I hope that you can just have enough time to run this model on your machine.
Basically in the MotionAndParameterOptimization process, you don’t need to consider the kinematics of the box.
The code for box is only meaningful(necessary) when you run the InverseDynamics analysis.

Basically your models was not too bad.
I only tried to change the locations of the box.

Good Luck. Now you are very close to the final.

Best regards,
Moonki

dstambolian · July 7, 2014, 8:24pm

Moonki

Thank you for the encouragement.

Sincerely thanks
Damon