Static Data Markers

Hello,

I just started using AnyGait and I need to use some custom mocap data. I keep running into errors concerning the static data markers.

[SIZE=1]ERROR(SCR.PRS9)[/SIZE] : [SIZE=1]//n…h/s…$/s…a/D…p/A…h/A…s/A…n/A…t/A…e/M…l/O…l/K…l/StickFigure.any(13)[/SIZE] : Defined at : [SIZE=1]//n…h/s…$/s…a/D…p/A…h/A…s/A…n/A…t/A…e/M…l/O…l/K…l/Marker.any(4)[/SIZE] : ‘RTHI’ : Unresolved object
Model loading skipped

[SIZE=2]which points to this line in the script:

[SIZE=2][SIZE=2][SIZE=1]AnyVec3[/SIZE][/SIZE] sRTHI = { Main.ModelSetup.StaticData.Points.Markers.ABTstat_RTHI.PosInterpol.Data[0][0],
[/SIZE]
I am sure that the marker name is correct. When I look into the model tree it doesn’t have the RTHI marker within the static data set markers.
How does AnyGait choose which markers are static and which aren’t?

Could someone help me out with this? I’d greatly appreciate it.

Thanks,
Samar
[/SIZE]

Dear Samar,
please edit your profile and add your University in order to use this forum. AnyGait uses the static trial to scale the model therefore the markers from the static trials are used.
You need to edit the marker.any file and change the define statement. This means if there is a ABTstat_RTHI in the code, it will be replaced with the following word, it is by default RTHI, but if in your trial this marker has a different name, you need to type in your marker name here.

Thank you for your reply! I updated my profile.

I do have another question concerning AnyBody’s compatibility with the knee alignment device (KAD). The static trial I’m evaluating was made using the KAD, therefore I need to implement the data I got from there into AnyGait. Does AnyBody have a plug-in for processing KAD data?

I realize this is a long shot since I couldn’t find any information about it in this forum and elsewhere but I figured it wouldn’t hurt to ask. If you do know anything about this topic, please let me know. If not, thanks again for your previous help! I appreciate it.

Best,
Samar

Hi Samar,

we wanted to implement the functionality of the KAD, but had no time for it so far. I also cannot promise we will find time in the near future for it. Sorry

test t

Dear Samar,

I think the easiest way to go about this for you is to pre-process the KAD data such that you have estimates of the medial and lateral condyle positions. These you can then add to your c3d files as virtual markers and proceed with the analysis just as if the markers had been placed on the medial and lateral condyle.

Best regards
Michael